case law Case regulation is legislation that is based on judicial decisions rather than regulation based on constitutions , statutes , or regulations . Case law concerns exceptional disputes resolved by courts using the concrete facts of a case. By contrast, statutes and regulations are written abstractly. Case legislation, also used interchangeably with common regulation , refers to the collection of precedents and authority established by previous judicial decisions on the particular issue or subject matter.
Case law is specific to the jurisdiction in which it was rendered. For instance, a ruling inside of a California appellate court would not commonly be used in deciding a case in Oklahoma.
However, decisions rendered from the Supreme Court of the United States are binding on all federal courts, and on state courts regarding issues in the Constitution and federal regulation.
Typically, the burden rests with litigants to appeal rulings (like People in crystal clear violation of proven case legislation) to your higher courts. If a judge acts against precedent, as well as the case will not be appealed, the decision will stand.
149 . Const. P. 6193/2016 (D.B.) Syed Musawar Shah V/S M.D CSD and Ors Sindh High Court, Karachi First and foremost, we would address the issue of maintainability of the instant Petition under Article 199 of the Constitution based around the doctrine of laches as this petition was filed in 2016, whereas the alleged cause of action accrued towards the petitioner in 1992. The petitioner asserts that he pursued his legal remedy just after involvement from the FIR lodged by FIA and from the intervening period the respondent dismissed him from service where after he preferred petition No.
While there isn't any prohibition against referring to case legislation from a state other than the state in which the case is being read, it holds small sway. Still, if there isn't any precedent during the home state, relevant case law from another state could possibly be viewed as through the court.
When the state court hearing the case reviews the regulation, he finds that, while it mentions large multi-tenant properties in some context, it can be actually really obscure about whether the 90-day provision relates to all landlords. The judge, based about the specific circumstances of Stacy’s case, decides that all landlords are held for the ninety-day notice necessity, and rules in Stacy’s favor.
168 . H.C.A 203/2016 (D.B.) Saleh Muhammad V/S Faqir Muhammad & others Sindh High Court, Karachi Matter: Appeal At times it is easy for the Judge to dismiss the suit for non-prosecution, however, a Judge is under the obligation to create an attempt to get rid of a case on benefit and more importantly when after recording of evidence it's got attained to a stage of final arguments, endeavors should be made for benefit disposal when it has achieved these types of stage. Read more
The DCFS social worker in charge on the boy’s case had the boy made a ward of DCFS, and in her six-month report for the court, the worker elaborated on the boy’s sexual abuse history, and more info stated that she planned to maneuver him from a facility into a “more homelike setting.” The court approved her plan.
Matter:-PROTECTION Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) Const. P. 114/2025 (S.B.) Mst. Zoya and another V/S The Province of Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Karachi SHC Citation: SHC-251830 Tag:Additionally, the main objectives of the police would be to apprehend offenders, look into crimes, and prosecute them before the Courts, also to prevent the commission of crime, and higher than all, assure legislation and order to protect citizens' lives and property. The law enjoins the police to generally be scrupulously fair towards the offender and the Magistracy is to make sure a fair investigation and fair trial for an offender. Unfortunately, these objectives have remained unfulfilled. Deviations of police officers and police excesses in dealing with the regulation and order situation have been the topic of adverse comments from this Court along with from other Courts, but they have failed to have any corrective effect on it.
162 . Const. P. 256/2025 (D.B.) Hafeezullah V/S Govt of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi It is actually well-settled that the civil servants must first pursue internal appeals within ninety times. If the appeal isn't decided within that timeframe, he/she can then method the service tribunal to challenge the original order. Once they are doing so, the Tribunal must decide the appeal on merits and cannot merely direct the department to decide it, since the ninety days for your department to act has already expired. Over the aforesaid proposition, we're guided from the decision of the Supreme Court from the case of Dr.
Any court may possibly search for to distinguish the present case from that of a binding precedent, to achieve a different conclusion. The validity of this type of distinction may or may not be accepted on appeal of that judgment to your higher court.
Generally, only an appeal accepted through the court of previous resort will resolve this kind of differences and, For several reasons, these kinds of appeals in many cases are not granted.
Matter:-SERVICE Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) Const. P. 642/2023 (D.B.) Fatima Noor V/S Dow University of Health Science and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi SHC Citation: SHC-225471 Tag:Coming to your main case, It's also a very well-set up proposition of legislation that when an inquiry is conducted on charges of misconduct by a public servant, the Court is concerned with determining whether the inquiry was held by a competent officer or whether rules of natural justice are complied with. Whether the findings or conclusions are based on some evidence, the authority entrusted with the power to hold inquiry has jurisdiction, power, and authority to succeed in a finding of fact or conclusion. But that finding must be based on some evidence. Neither the technical rules nor proof of the fact or evidence during the Stricto-Sensu, use to disciplinary proceedings. When the authority accepts that evidence and conclusion acquire support therefrom, the disciplinary authority is entitled to hold that the delinquent officer is guilty from the charge, however, that is topic on the procedure provided under the relevant rules instead of otherwise, for the reason that the Court in its power of judicial review does not act as appellate authority to re-recognize the evidence and to reach at its independent findings over the evidence.